Sunday, 21 November 2010
speechless
Wednesday, 27 October 2010
Halloween Spirit
Wednesday, 20 October 2010
More More More!
JUNE 20th, 2009
YEAR ONE
In the same vein as Superbad (as well as containing a majority of the same film’s cast), Year One is able to pull the laughs, scoffs, “ewwws,” and cult fans.
The film boasts a stellar cast of comedic giants like Hank Azaria, Oliver Platt and David Cross. But aside from the many hilarious cameos, the primary cast is perfect in each of their roles. They offer just the right amount of true acting talent, even if it is buried underneath disgusting scenes where characters piss all over their own faces, shit in their beds, and repeat many of the same jokes, over and over again.
Aside from the “toilet humor” throughout, the film is actually pretty good for this genre, and I think this can be attributed to its direction. What makes Harold Ramis such a fantastic director is his ability to understand both sides of filmmaking - what it takes behind the scenes to make a film great, and what the actors in front of the camera must project in order to give the performance demanded of them. Ramis is able to relate to his actors, and can therefore draw out the comedy necessary to get just the right amount of laughs. His hands on approach is what has made Year One an effective film. This is a Harold Ramis film, through and through.
And the multitude of Jewish jokes… oy! Don’t get my started. Hilarious… if not, again, over done…
In all honesty, this is my kind of genre. I’m a Jack Black junkie and I love Michael Cera’s dry delivery. These men are characters in their own right, which makes them relatable and believable. When one imagines meeting them in person, it’s almost expected that hey will behave as their characters always do. Well done casting team, well done.
-----------------
WEEDS - SEASON 5
Only 3 episodes in, and Season 5 is already proving to be much more entertaining than the train wreck that was Season 4 of Weeds.
Shane is still incredibly troubled, but that’s what we’ve come to expect from him. At this point it’s no longer annoying. His quirky and disturbing interest in his own family’s sexual exploits is now nothing more than a strange and almost acceptably character trait.
Nancy’s formerly irritating ignorance is FINALLY getting her into trouble. She’s not simply a pair of big brown eyes anymore. She knows what’s going down, and it’s starting to break her. While last season I was simply annoyed with her story, I now look forward to what comes next.
Celia is still a bit excessive… but now that she’s finally admitted she has no friends and nobody to turn to, she is actually becoming somewhat relatable.
The episodes are better written and, as usual, incredibly well directed and shot. Season 5 is looking promising kiddies… Lets see what happens…
Catching Up...
Realized I have some left over posts from my Tumbler that never made the journey here to blogger...
WEEDS
Finally making my way through the fourth season of Weeds (trying to catch up before the new season begins this week), and I’m thoroughly disappointed with the quality of the show these days.
Season Three started to go downhill towards the end, but I never expected it to get this bad. The writing and dialogue are still up to par, and the acting is always fantastic, but it seems the writers are reaching for plot points and story lines. Everything is over the top and exaggerated, and the characters are becoming caricatures of their former selves. Nancy’s wide eyed play at innocence is getting old, but her attempts at dominance are growing more pathetic. And poor, poor Silas, always failing with the women in his life, getting stuck in reckless and uncomfortable situations. Shane’s smart/eccentric little boy phase is also becoming overwhelming. Taking control of security in the house… awesome. The whole talking to his dead father thing… weird. Masturbating to old pictures of Nancy… awwwwwkwarrrrdddd. And don’t even get me started on Celia.
As far as this viewer is concerned, the only ray of light in the show anymore is Guillermo. I’m a huge fan of Diaz’s work (particularly in the masterpiece “Half Baked”), and I’m really glad that they’ve kept him around… I was hoping that he’d become a more regular character after his first appearance.
I’m desperately hoping that Season Five has more to offer.
----------
STAR TRECK
Monday evening I went to see STAR TRECK with my uncle - a fan since childood - and I actually thoroughly enjoyed the film! I was really shocked, though, to find that my uncle loved it too. I was convinced he would take issue with inaccuracies, or simply with the fact that it was a remake of one of his childhood favorites... But no. He had just as much fun as I did.
The special effects are surprisingly well done. Nothing is over the top, and the film’s visual style is able to stand on its own, while remaining somewhat reminiscent of George Lucas’ original “Star Wars” trilogy. There is no reason to question the blending of environments - Vulcan cities, schools, and topography are equally as realistic as Earths dry Iowa. The futuristic elements do not overshadow the realistic settings, nor do they take away from the very human interactions throughout the film. In terms of effects and style, the only problem I encountered while watching the film was Kirk’s green love interest - she brought up images of Idina Menzel in “Wicked” on Broadway.
One confusing element of the film is the time travel and existence of a present and future Spock. Obviously this is one circumstance where reason and believability is overcome by story (We are talking about a science fiction film, after all!). However, as I left the theater I felt as if there were some significant plot holes. I simply might not have been paying close enough attention to the explanation of this anomaly… But as such a significant portion of the film revolved around time travel, especially changes in the course of history, I was left feeling that the overall issue was unresolved.
Finally, the acting is impeccable. Zachary Quinto’s performance as Spock has been surprisingly praised by old-school Treckies and new fans alike (even by Leonard Nimoy himself!). He is able to master his character’s emotionlessness, providing a dramatic and serious performance, while also adding hints of coy and knowing sarcasm that only Quinto can deliver. Performances aside though, the real beauty of the film lies in the casting choices made by the filmmakers. Unexpected but fitting picks such as John Cho, Simon Pegg and even the young Jimmy Bennett bring the characters to life, turing them into dynamic and relatable individuals - not caricatures of the original cast. One unusual choice, though, is the casting of Winona Ryder as Spock’s human mother. Not believable. Not good. Simply… odd.
Overall, I really enjoyed this film. It was exciting, entertaining, but also well made. All the elements (cinematography, direction, writing, etc) came together cohesively and effectively to produce a great summer blockbuster.
Tuesday, 7 September 2010
Bubblings
Sunday, 22 August 2010
The Last Exorcism
Sunday, 27 June 2010
Brilliance
Friday, 28 May 2010
Summer Releases and Must Sees
Monday, 22 March 2010
Up and Coming
4.02.10 - Clash of the Titans
Dexter Scott album release
4.03.10 - Moonchildren Presented by Atlantic Theater Company, Directed by TODD THALER!
4.04.10 - Bonobo @ The Music Hall of Williamsburg
4.16.10 - Death at a Funeral
Kick-Ass
4.30.10 - Nightmare on Elm Street
6.30.10 - Passion Pit @ Governors Island
9.17.10 - Vampire Weekend
Films that I still need to see:
The Runaways
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Sunday, 28 February 2010
COP OUT

Once upon a time Kevin Smith made a decent movie with a star-studded cast… and they all lived happily ever after. If it sounds familiar, that’s because it is. COP OUT wasn’t nearly as disappointing as I expected it to be, but there really isn’t much to say about how wonderful or funny it is either. Normally I enjoy Smith’s films, but this one wasn’t quite up to standards. I’ve learned that he generally writes his own stuff. According to Entertainment Weekly, this is the first time he’s directed a film and not at least co-written it. So I suppose I have to go a little easy on him – he’s out of his comfort zone.
A little behind the ball on this one

Eric Rohmer passed away on January 11th, 2010 and I didn’t even know about it until Friday February 19th, at 3:48pm. How did this happen? One of the most influential and creative minds in the film world, and there wasn’t even a single blip on my radar for an entire month… I could actually see myself still going on blindly until another month from now when the Oscars annual tribute to those who have passed is screened. But what the hell!? Really? How did I not know about this?
Do I not read enough news? Yes, I can honestly say I don’t follow the news as much as I’d like. Do I not watch enough television? Certainly not. Although I don’t watch much news, I do watch entertainment channels. Even they cover important details about people like Rohmer…. Or so I thought… So what happened? Was his death simply washed over by more important and significant information like Tiger Woods’ pending apology (which was a disappointment as expected anyway)? Or Kourtney Kardashian’s baby’s father being an insolent prick? Or the Olympics for that matter? Was everyone so caught up in the hype of international athleticism that this incredible man’s death was just swept under the rug with all the other things I feel I should know?
The New York Times published a lovely obituary. But why didn’t I receive an email update when it was put out!? I got an email when Bill Clinton went to the hospital. I got an email when Sean White won a gold medal. I get an email every time civilians are injured in the Middle East. So how is it that Eric Rohmer wasn’t considered important enough to warrant an email alert?
I feel confident saying that this clearly isn’t just a case of my laziness to collect and absorb news. There was a serious case of inactivity on the media’s part which allowed this information to go unnoticed for over a month. This particular situation leads me to believe that there is something terribly wrong with today’s media priorities. Obviously I don’t believe a singular man’s death is more significant than the crisis in Haiti, or our country’s internal battle over healthcare reform. However, how is it that even entertainment news – “news” which is supposed to cover important details about the inner workings of the industry – did not make any significant mention of Rohmer’s passing? This boggles my mind. There’s something terribly wrong with the system if one of the men who led the way for today’s filmmakers is overlooked. Forty years from now, will Almodivar be so overlooked by American media? Will Quentin Tarantino’s films be all that’s left when he dies?
Okay kids, bold statement… Today’s media doesn’t have the respect for amazingly talented people like Rohmer.
Sunday, 21 February 2010
In His Honor
His actual desires are not displayed in dialogue or interactions with others, but in the shots and techniques used. In regards to Claire and her knee, the only time the camera is every really close to Jerome is when he is talking to her – specifically in the scene when she gets injured playing volleyball. He sits close to her, and the camera angle is often a tight shot of both characters, or of her – sitting with her knee up against her chest. When we first become aware of his fascination with her knee, we see her from his point of view and there is a close up of this awkward body part while she’s on the ladder picking cherries. By turning the camera into the eyes of Jerome, we are able to see exactly what he desires and even get a sense of his thoughts and emotions at the time.
When we first meet Laura, the camera plays similar tricks on the audience. At first, it seems as if her entrance is just like any other – the camera focuses on her as she sits at the table with the adults – however it lingers and closes in on her. It becomes clear that we are seeing through Jerome’s eyes, and although he claims he does not feel anything for her later in the film, it is clear that he is drawn to her for some reason. His relationship with Laura again shows the dichotomy between his actions/words and the way the scenes are shot. He constantly tells Aurora about his disinterest in Laura, and there are also scenes in which he reminds the young woman about his wife-to-be. He distances himself from Laura emotionally, yet physically they are always close. They hold hands, she rests against him as if they were a couple, and the camera is always very close to them when they are together. Unlike the scene on the bridge, the proximity of the camera reflects the physical closeness as well as the overall intimacy of the scenes between Laura and Jerome.
What I think is most interesting about the film, however, is the fact that the woman he does desire – Claire – is never very close to him physically, nor does she open up to him at all in their conversations. However, with Laura, they have mature and personal conversations while almost always remaining physically connected.
